Skip to Main Content

IP Law: Copyright

This guide includes a copyright law primer, practical guides for working in the field, and legal research resources.

Sources of Law

Constitutional Basis

U.S. Copyright Law is derived from several sources, beginning with U.S. Constitution. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 states:

[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

This Patent and Copyright Clause was adopted in its final form without debate in a secret proceeding on September 5, 1787. In its final form, the Patent and Copyright Clause empowers Congress to grant authors and inventors exclusive rights in their writings and discoveries for a limited time. This clause is the foundation for federal copyright law. Under this Clause, Congress can grant "Authors" exclusive rights to their "Writings." The purpose of this clause is to facilitate uniform, national law governing patents and copyrights. This was a response to the patchwork state-law system that prevailed in the Articles of Confederation period, where creators had to obtain copyrights in multiple states under different standards. This process was expensive and complicated and often failed to provide adequate protection. 

Copyright  Act of 1790

Three years after the final adoption of the Patent and Copyright Clause, Congress enacted the first Copyright Act of 1790. Congress modeled the Act of 1790 on the Statute of Anne (enacted by the British parliament in 1709), and set the tone for future copyright legislation. The of act of 1790 gave protection to the author or their assigns of maps, charts, and books for two-fourteen-year terms in an original and renewal term. From the act of 1790-1909, copyright law underwent two general revisions, in addition to several essential amendments, which extensively elaborated many aspects of copyrightable subject matter, rights, remedies, and administration.   

The Copyright Act of 1909

In December 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt called for a complete revision of copyright law to meet modern conditions. The Copyright Act of 1909 contained important revisions such as including "all the writings of an author" and a bifurcated durational twenty-eight-year renewal term, conferring copyright protection for a possible fifty-six years. Under the 1909 Act, federal copyright protection began at the moment of publication--rather than when the work's title was filed for registration as had been previously required. Unpublished works --except those works which were not intended for reproduction (such as motion pictures or speeches). From 1909 until the passage of the 1976 Act, congress made several amendments to the 1909 Act until Congress realized the need for new legislation. Note that works that predate the effective date of the 1976 Act are governed by statutory provisions of the 1909 Copyright Act. 

Copyright Act of 1976

The 1976 Act made innovative changes and clarified certain aspects of existing copyright law. Important aspects of the Act Include:

a) Preemption of Common Law Copyright (§ 301)

b) Duration (replaced the dual twenty-eight-year terms for a single extended term that includes the author's life + 50 years).

c). Formalities such as notice for all published works and registration.

d) The 1976 Act established broad categories of subject matter that are to be construed liberally and include: 1) literary works; 2) musical works; 3) dramatic works; 4) pantomines and choreographic works; 5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; 6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works; 7) sound recordings; and 8) architectural works. 

e) The Exclusive Rights and Their Limitations: § 106 of the 1976 Act enumerated 5 exclusive rights of copyright ownership: the rights to reproduce and adapt the copyrighted work and to distribute, perform, and display it publicly. In 1990, Congress added a sixth exclusive right--a performance right for sound recordings by digital audio transmissions. § 196A imposes various limitations on these exclusive rights (such as the fair use privilege found in § 107). 

f) ownership of copyright is divisible under the 1976 Act, the copyright owner can now license or assign parts of the copyright to third parties who can bring suits for infringement of their ownership rights. 

There have been several legislative developments from 1978-1988 , such as the addition of § 117 (involving the the protection and scope of rights in computer programs) and the passage of the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984. 

Other important additions to the Copyright Act of 1976 include the:

Sonny Bobo Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA) extended the term of copyright protection to twenty years for works created by an individual on or after January 1, 1978 (a term measured by the lift of the author plus seventy years). 

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) (1998) enacted an astonishing number of disparate measures, including implementing the two treaties on copyright and on performances and phonograms, adopted by the World Intellectual Property Organization in 1996. 

The Music Modernization Act (MMA) in 2018. This was the first significant piece of legislation affecting the music industry since 1995. The MMA revised the "mechanical compulsory license" for the digital age, reflecting the technological changes in how music is now consumed. Title II of the MMA, known as the Classics Act, conferred federal copyright protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. 

State Laws

U.S. copyright protection is governed by federal law. Section 301(a) of the 1976 Act preempts all similar protections provided by state law, other than with respect to sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, as provided under Section 301(c) of the Act. Preemption applies only when a state law provides protections that are equivalent to those set forth in the Copyright Act (i.e., rights equivalent to any of the exclusive rights under Section 106 of the Act in fixed works of authorship that fall within the subject matter of copyright). There are a significant number of court decisions interpreting exactly when a state claim is close enough to an exclusive right provided by the Copyright Act to be preempted. This case law should be consulted for questions regarding preemption and may vary to some extent by jurisdiction. Sections 301(b) and (c) of the 1976 Act also specifically set forth some types of copyright-like protections that states may provide. These include: (i) works not fixed in a tangible medium of expression; (ii) a narrow exception for nonsubscription broadcast transmission of pre-1972 sound recordings; (iii) state and local landmarks, historic preservation, zoning, or building codes relating to architectural works protected under Section 102(a)(8) of the Act; and (iv) causes of actions for acts that took place before January 1, 1978.) --From the U.S. Copyright Office's Chapter 100:15. 

Chastek Library, Gonzaga University School of Law | 721 N. Cincinnati St. Spokane, WA 99220-3528 | 509.313.3758

Accessibility